![]() ![]() should we put in Niko Bellic in there? You could but it would be a half-assed option because it’s generic. The game is iconic, no arguing about that. I never said he doesn’t deserve to be in smash. Do you consider the rocks in LOTR a character? I mean, he has the same amount of personality. He is not a character, it’s a generic avatar with zero personality in it, thus it doesn’t qualify as a “character” (not to confuse to “being in smash”). One thing is that the game is popular and that “the dude” shared the same visual aesthetic as any other living thing in the game. My complain started that this is a poor attempt to consider these pieces of cubes a “character”. Thu 1st Oct ummm I’ve never said that he shouldn’t be in smash.Clearly not, because he’s already on his way. You’re absolutely entitled to your opinion of Steve, but all I’m saying is your personal opinion doesn’t make him irrelevant. You’re not simply saying you wish he weren’t included you’re saying he should not be in the game, and I’m saying that your personal opinion of a character has never been a qualifier for a character’s inclusion, and it makes zero logical sense to try to argue that. Your only argument revolves around how you personally don’t like his character design and that somehow means he should not be in Smash. This is about his relevance to gaming and Nintendo and his moveset potential, which are the only real consistent qualifiers for a Smash character. This is absolutely not about my opinion of Steve. Steve was nowhere near the top of my list of characters I wanted (I would’ve loved Rayman). ![]() I’ve dabbled over the years but I’m definitely not a super fan. ![]() Thu 1st Oct I’m not a big fan of Minecraft.Your arguments about his design ultimately boil down to your personal tastes and you’re entitled to those, but to try to objectively translate your tastes into a logical argument as to why he doesn’t belong here is just silly, especially since it’s already happening in a way that clearly works and makes sense. The only real qualification for a Smash fighter is relevance to gaming and Nintendo (which Steve absolutely has) and moveset potential (again, not a problem here). The same would apply to the other examples you mentioned, except none of them have the recognizablility or relevance that Steve and Minecraft do. Many would argue that a block from Tetris would make a welcome addition to Smash, due to its relevance to gaming and Nintendo, but the problem comes in the moveset, a problem that Steve clearly doesn’t have. You say he’s “not a character” but neither is Villager. Game & Watch is arguably simpler in design and far less recognizable. Thu 1st Oct But why does his simple design disqualify him? Mr.I can like Minecraft and despise this attempt of a “character”. So you can’t just minimize my argument to “you just don’t like Minecraft”. ![]() It’s the only character in around 60 in the roster I’ve ever complained about. it says it has a name in the manual! He’s now got a personality! Yey!Īnd It’s not just the looks, it’s a mix of various elements in which you can’t compare Kirby as a character to “Steve”. It’s like when the characters in the 80s were just soul less. I mean, he didn’t even had a name until the internet “baptized” him. It may be my opinion as a designer, that’s why it baffles me that this generic dude got into smash. it’s as generic as a Tetris block.īecause it’s popular doesn’t mean it is Smash material. It’s the characterization, the personality.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |